tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post821282695670465355..comments2023-05-21T07:30:41.022-07:00Comments on eLearning Cyclops: What I Would Like to Say About HTML5 and FlashJeff Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15888791396223781322noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-56584387608471950042010-06-27T05:53:08.000-07:002010-06-27T05:53:08.000-07:00Good post Jeff. I am still not all the way there ...Good post Jeff. I am still not all the way there with learning all of the features of HTML5. I know what it does from the video end of things. But I am not yet clear on the animation side of things. I saw the Spiderman animation but reading the article, it just seems very complex. Why would I go through all of that when Flash is an all in one tool to some degree? I can produce, animate, import and publish right from one tool. Again, maybe I don't understand everything. To be honest, I am not a big Flash user. I use more rapid development tools than anything else at this point but again, using the CSS3, jquery, HTML5 option seems a bit overkill on the development end of things. But, that's just me and its also in the early stages of this so I'm sure we'll see some more trimmed down options in the next years. But now, I'm not on the bandwagon just yet.<br><br>RKRobert Kennedy IIIhttp://www.rkcslearning.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-71400599664782198152010-06-27T12:24:50.000-07:002010-06-27T12:24:50.000-07:00Robert,Thanks for the comments. I think you're...Robert,<br><br>Thanks for the comments. I think you're right, we probably will see "trimmed down" options in the years to come. As it progresses we will see more WYSIWYG authoring tools for it. Dreamweaver is already offering something, but I bet some e-learning authoring tools will also offer HTML5 as an output too down the road.<br><br>Here are my Delicious links for HTML5 if you are looking for more info on the subject, http://delicious.com/MinuteBio/HTML5.<br><br>Thanks again,<br><br>Jeff.Jeffhttp://www.minutebio.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-59521705829686857022010-06-28T02:42:41.000-07:002010-06-28T02:42:41.000-07:00The site http://caniuse.com/ is a good resource to...The site http://caniuse.com/ is a good resource to show which tags of HTML5 are supported in which browsers. A lot of HTML5 features are waiting for IE9 and with the number of IE6 users still out there, even when IE9 is released it's going to take several years before you have over 90% of browser users supporting it. Currently, most major analytic websites have between 50% to 60% users have browsers with very limited HTML5 feature set. So unless you want to target a small subset of users with HTML5 features, most companies are not going to have commercial websites using HTML5.Matthew Fabbhttp://www.matthewfabb.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-74264940145523413882010-06-28T03:37:44.000-07:002010-06-28T03:37:44.000-07:00Your post was very interesting! I have also been c...Your post was very interesting! I have also been considering the effectiveness of both Flash and HTML5 and the competition between the two. I almost feel that there should be little competition, at least at this stage, and the buzz around either one "dying" is just that, buzz. Everyone was talking and excited when HTML5 was announced, but like you said, it's still in its infancy and has a long way to go. At this point, I would agree with you and suggest to users to keep using what they know, and if that's Flash, then don't veer away, but don't ward off HTML5 completely. The capabilities of both are significant, but for different reasons and purposes. I'm interested to see how HTML5 develops and how Flash, and its users, adapt!<br><br>Heather Thomas<br>Trivantis Corporation<br>Cincinnati, OH<br>www.trivantis.com/blogHeather Thomashttp://www.trivantis.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-81965455976001536102010-06-28T05:13:26.000-07:002010-06-28T05:13:26.000-07:00Matthew,Thanks for the resource and info. For me, ...Matthew,<br><br>Thanks for the resource and info. For me, I have been using Chrome to view HTML5 with luck, but your right that commercial sites are not going to use it until it is more prevalent in browsers.<br><br>JeffJeffhttp://www.minutebio.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-61845051787199907262010-06-28T05:26:39.000-07:002010-06-28T05:26:39.000-07:00Heather,Thank you for the comments.Being that your...Heather,<br><br>Thank you for the comments.<br>Being that your company offers e-learning authoring tools (e.g. Lectora), do you think it would be a very difficult transition to a HTML5 output if you needed to, or chose to, make a transition in the future? I know it would be very speculative for now, but your input would be appreciated.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>JeffJeffhttp://www.minutebio.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-77722240714446947842010-06-29T15:20:17.000-07:002010-06-29T15:20:17.000-07:00You have misunderstood the 2022 number. If you rea...You have misunderstood the 2022 number. If you read the interview carefully, you will see what the criteria for becoming a "recommendation" are, and I'll say this: HTML 4 does not qualify as a "recommendation" and neither does HTML 3!<br><br>The reality of HTML 5's availability is that the spec is no longer undergoing major changes, most browsers significantly support it, and when IE 9 launches, you can use the bulk of its most important features without fear.<br><br>J.JaJustin Jameshttp://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/programming-and-development/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-8880584693429734772010-06-29T15:31:40.000-07:002010-06-29T15:31:40.000-07:00Thanks for the clarification.JeffThanks for the clarification.<br><br>JeffJeffhttp://www.minutebio.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-18727193787037999742010-08-03T10:36:35.000-07:002010-08-03T10:36:35.000-07:00Totally agree with you Jeff , simple things that p...Totally agree with you Jeff , simple things that people should understand in here, if you still remember YouTube ,and another video's streaming media .. you definitely loves Flash , it doesn't mean i don't put any respect to HTML5 , well ..stop comparing people , Flash is a media that brought us to the lighter in internet era, what happen back then , if there is no video's streaming ? Hell yeah, i can't learn anything from a millions people out there from their use full videos on Youtube.izoelhttp://izoel.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-41969341308529815572011-01-12T06:37:12.000-08:002011-01-12T06:37:12.000-08:00Jeff, I am keeping my finger on the HTML5 pulse bo...Jeff, I am keeping my finger on the HTML5 pulse both in the elearning and the larger web development world (well, let's say my finger is back on the pulse now -- I had a few months off the radar after my twins were born last June!).<br><br>It's true that HTML5 does not yet have all the capabilities of Flash. However, neither does any rapid development tool that publishes to either HTML or SWF, and most of the elearning industry uses rapid development tools, not Flash Pro (according to the eLearning Guild's annual reports). So my question to you and your audience is, "Which capabilities of Flash do you need for your course development, that HTML5 does not provide?" This is a serious question, not an attempt to start a flame war. :)Judy Unreinhttp://onehundredfortywords.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5872191505091733640.post-91235138375657295872011-01-13T15:28:09.000-08:002011-01-13T15:28:09.000-08:00Please do answer in depth in a post! It's high...Please do answer in depth in a post! It's high time there was some serious discussion of HTML5 up in here (and by here I mean the interwebs, not your blog). I'll be watching for it!Judy Unreinhttp://onehundredfortywords.comnoreply@blogger.com